Reducing Postoperative CT Imaging for Children With Complicated Appendicitis: A Pediatric Surgical Quality Collaborative Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread initiatives to reduce ionizing radiation for appendicitis diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) scanning postoperatively remains common. The Pediatric Surgery Quality Collaborative (PSQC) aimed to identify differences between children's hospitals with high and low postoperative CT usage for complicated appendicitis. METHODS: Using National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Pediatric data from PSQC children's hospitals, we compared postoperative CT imaging for complicated appendicitis (April 2020-March 2021). Key stakeholders from 11 hospitals (5 low CT utilization, 6 high CT utilization) participated in semi-structured interviews regarding postoperative imaging. Qualitative analysis of transcripts was performed deductively and inductively based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS: Five of twelve TDF domains were most prominent in influencing CT use: skills, beliefs about capabilities, intentions/goals, memory and decision processes, and environment. Children's hospitals with lower rates of postoperative CT use tended to: trust and educate the ultrasound technicians; believe US strengths outweigh weaknesses; image no sooner than 7 days postoperatively; have access to sufficient quality improvement resources; maintain trusting relationships between specialties; and prioritize radiation stewardship. CONCLUSION: Hospitals at extremes of postoperative CT use for complicated appendicitis reveal strategies for improvement, which include imaging protocol development and adherence, quality improvement resource availability, interdisciplinary collaboration, and promoting radiation stewardship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Multicenter retrospective comparison of spontaneous intestinal perforation outcomes between primary peritoneal drain and primary laparotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy. METHODS: We performed a multi-institution retrospective review of infants with diagnosis of SIP from 2012 to 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain vs infants treated with laparotomy. RESULTS: We identified 171 patients treated for SIP (drain n = 110 vs. laparotomy n = 61). There were no differences in maternal or prenatal characteristics. There were no clinically significant differences in vital signs, white blood cell or platelet measures, up to 48 h after intervention. Patients who were treated primarily with a drain were more premature (24.9 vs. 27.2 weeks, p < 0.001) and had lower median birth weight (710 g vs. 896 g, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay (LOS) or mortality between the groups. Primary laparotomy group had more procedures (median number 1 vs. 2, p = 0.002). There were 32 (29%) primary drain failures whereby a laparotomy was ultimately needed. CONCLUSIONS: SIP treated with primary drain is successful in the majority of patients with no significant differences in outcomes when compared to laparotomy with stoma. THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.